Proposal of “Philosophy of Life” as a Philosophical Discipline

It is far better to think of life as a journey in which the difficulties are hills to climb.

If after ourphysical death there is "nothing" then when we die we will notexperience calm or peace or pain or distress, we will not experience anythingbecause we will not exist. "Nothing" will not relieve us of anythingsimply because there will be no one to experience relief, there will be no"you" who can feel the absence of pain. You will not remember thegood times or the horrific events in your life. We need to accept the difficultbut essential point, if nothing follows physical death then there is nopeaceful sleep because no one exists who can sleep, there are no nightmaresbecause there is no one to dream. All will be as if it never was.

The following isvery hard to explain and may take several readings and a great deal of effortto understand. The limits of human comprehension make it extremely difficult torecognize the fact that if there is a nihilistic void after physical death,then there is absolutely no reason at all to think about the"nothing" that may follow physical life. Nothing cannot affect ourphysical lives, either positively or negatively. It cannot be a part of ourexistence, it cannot be a part of our thoughts, it is nothing.

If there isnothing after physical death, there can be absolutely no benefit to a shorterlife, no logical reason to want physical life to end. If there is nothing afterdeath the choice to endure the most horrible pain and seek meaning and value inour life can cause us no harm. Even though it may seem absurd, if we do notexist after our physical death we have no reason to fear, or avoid, five yearsor fifty years of pain. The all consuming nature of the “nothing” that mayfollow physical death is what human beings find almost impossible tocomprehend, yet understanding the possibility of “nothing” frees us to live thebest life we can.

Special Issue: Nihilism and the Meaning of Life: A Philosophical Dialogue with James Tartaglia

Socrates left no writings, though he was constantly engaged in philosophic discussion. Our knowledge of his ideas and methods comes mainly from dialogues written by his pupil Plato. In most of the dialogues, Socrates appears as the main character, who leads and develops the process of inquiry.

~Kathy NorrisThe line of life is a snarl of loops and ends.

Socrates lived in Athens and taught in the streets, market place, and gymnasiums. He taught by a question-and-answer method. Socrates tried to get a definition or precise view of some abstract idea, such as knowledge, virtue, justice, or wisdom. He would use close, sharp questioning, constantly asking "What do you mean?" and "How do you know?" This procedure, called the Socratic method, became the model for philosophic methods that emphasize debate and discussion.

On Life's railroad there is only one set of rails and no turntable.

Others’ lives are connected to mine, and all these are in the stream of a large life.

The endless tendency in our civilization to eliminate pain and suffering makes us totally lose sight of the meaning of life that is indispensable to human beings.

This is a fundamental question in philosophy of life.

Another sort of answer may be given, in which a motive of this kind is openly admitted. Religion must not be critically examined, because it is the highest, most precious and noblest thing that the mind of man has brought forth, because it gives expression to the deepest feelings, and is the only thing that makes the world bearable and life worthy of humanity. To this we need not reply by disputing this estimate of religion, but rather by drawing attention to another aspect of the matter. We should point out that it is not a question of the scientific spirit encroaching upon the sphere of religion, but of religion encroaching upon the sphere of scientific thought. Whatever value and importance religion may have, it has no right to set any limits to thought, and therefore has no right to except itself from the application of thought.

Philosophy in Life Essay | Majortests

For example, wecan speak of "nothing" being in an empty room. But that is not reallycorrect, for the room has dimensions and is filled with empty space. We mightsay that the room itself does not exist, therefore there is nothing. Yet whatwe are really saying is that the room does not exist within the bounded spacein which we exist, which is "something". We cannot fully comprehend aroom which because it is "nothing", does not exist anywhere, anytime.

good topics for research papers earquake Essay On My Life Philosophy how to write a phd theses how to write dissertation proposal writing

~Thomas Carlyle

I say to my child, I will explain to you as much of life as I can, but you must remember that there is a part of life for which you are the explanation.

Essay On My Life Philosophy - …

Philosophersoften speak of the void that would follow physical death without life afterdeath as the abyss, the unknown, the approaching void, etc. All of thesesuggest that we are on a journey to a "place" which lies at the endof our physical lifetimes. If on our death we cease to exist, this idea that weare traveling to our ultimate destiny is false. We are not traveling to anabyss, the void, or the unknown, for these words suggest that we are movingtoward something. I recognize the seeming absurdity of the language, yet if onour death we cease to exist, then "nothing" totally consumes us.

The value of philosophy essay - Resume, CV & …

I examined our desires, and divided them into two categories, "the desires of the body" and "the desires of life." I am planning to translate the whole book and publish it in English in the near future.