What then makes them conservative? It is the additional knowledge that things that have had a good reputation for a long time are more trustworthy than new things. This is especially true of original things. The very term principle refers to something that comes first; to change the principle of a thing is to change it into something else. Without the principle, the thing is lost.
The temporal-parts ontology implies that each of us shares our currentthoughts with countless beings that diverge from one another in thepast or future. If this were true, which of these thingsshould we be? Of course, we are the things we refer to whenwe say ‘I’, or more generally the referents of ourpersonal pronouns and proper names. But these words would be unlikelyto succeed in referring to just one sort of thing—to only one ofthe many candidates on each occasion of utterance. There wouldprobably be some indeterminacy of reference, so that each suchutterance referred ambiguously to many different candidates. Thatwould make it indeterminate what things, and even what sort of things,we are. And insofar as the candidates have different histories anddifferent persistence conditions, it would be indeterminate when wecame into being and what it takes for us to persist (Sider 2001b).
For instance, it is a part of a being whose temporal boundaries aredetermined by relations of psychological continuity (Section 4) amongits stages. That is, one of the beings thinking your current thoughtsis an aggregate of person-stages, each of which is psychologicallycontinuous with each of the others and with no other stage. If this iswhat you are, then you persist by virtue of psychologicalcontinuity. Your current stage is also a part of a being whosetemporal boundaries are determined by relations ofpsychological connectedness. That is, one of the beings nowthinking your thoughts is an aggregate of person-stages, each of whichis psychologically connected with each of the others and to no otherstage. This may not be the same as the first being, as some stages maybe psychologically continuous with your current stage but notpsychologically connected with it. If this is what you are, thenpsychological connectedness is necessary and sufficient for you topersist (Lewis 1976). What’s more, your current stage is a part of ahuman organism, which persists by virtue of brute-physical continuity,and a part of many bizarre and gerrymandered objects, such as“contacti persons” (Hirsch 1982, ch. 10). Some even saythat you are your current stage itself (Sider 2001a,188–208). And there would be many other candidates.
11. An educated person doesn’t blindly accept what they are told; they go see for themselves. They can discern truth from error, regardless of the source.
What Makes You American :: Definition Essays
Last night I was asking myself these two questions: Who is an educated person? What does someone have to know in order to be considered an educated person? Look at the following:
What Makes an American an American
There is no way around this. The belief system of fundamentalism is constructed to sustain a perpetual siege mentality, and this siege mentality in turn makes the belief system seem even more real and urgent to fundamentalists when they perceive themselves to be under attack.
What Makes Someone a True American Essay - Anti …
The only way to stem the rising tide of Christian Nationalism and the religious right is for ordinary Americans to better understand what the religious right is and what it truly stands for. It has gained power only by keeping its true intentions under wraps, by using the Republican Party as a cover, and by portraying itself as conservative rather than radical.