September 2004 Remember the essays you had to write in high school

Topic sentence, introductory paragraph, supporting paragraphs, conclusion

For several years before writing this essay, I have stated that the only inventor-oriented approach with a prayer is for an inventor with the goods (a viable prototype undoubtedly generating FE) to give it to a worthy group so that they can take it the rest of the way, past humanity’s inertia and any organized suppression activities that might be inflicted on the effort. I have never heard of the inventor with the goods willing to give it away, and that worthy group does not yet exist; my efforts could be seen as trying to help form it. Criticizing the inventor with the goods who is unwilling to give it away, when there is nobody worth giving it to, is unproductive.

The next level of awareness is where Dennis, Brian, and I spent many years, and Dennis and Brian largely stayed there although I finally had to admit that it did not work and was unlikely to, which led to my current strategy. That . and drank deeply from the wells of their nationalist indoctrination, as . Dennis tried forming movements around Christian ideology early in his journey, and even tried it again in the 21st century. He also tried the “” approach, and almost all of his efforts either involved risk-free () marketing plans, business opportunities, or both. Dennis appealed to in the USA to attract interest in and involvement with his efforts. I to raise awareness of FE, and it was the last time that I will ever try the mass movement approach. Mass movements, by their very nature, appeal to lowest-common-denominator beliefs to form movement () “cohesion.” Unfortunately, those beliefs are usually false, as nationalism, capitalism, and organized religion are built on lies, half-truths, and self-serving myths. Little resembling enlightenment comes from such ideologies. I came to believe that true enlightenment is the missing ingredient, and the necessary prerequisite for such enlightenment is a caring heart. Without that caring heart, .

, who had a scientific career at General Electric, also believed that the energy industry would welcome his solid-state FE device. He , expecting a tickertape parade. The opposite happened as shadowy interests destroyed his business deals, in a situation . Sparky did not take the hint and kept trying, which led to death threats. After their final threats, Sparky fled into hiding, where , and Sparky died the next week of a “heart attack.” Dying that way who played near Sparky’s level, and , and the event shortened his life. Dennis, Sparky, and many others like them lost their naïveté the hard way, but the field has been filled with newcomers who deny the reality of organized suppression as they charge forward with visions of riches and fame. It is perhaps the most common level of awareness where FE newcomers will be found. Most never develop anything worth suppressing so will never know any differently, and will enter and leave the field with that beginner's level of awareness intact. However, with enough people trying and either living to tell the tale, or others chronicling their dire fates, which , and the Internet spreading information like never before, few FE newcomers have much excuse for being unaware of the fates of their professional ancestors. The Internet is like the , or the , ratcheted up by a few orders of magnitude, and my website, this essay, and my comprise my attempt to take advantage of its potential.

Complete text of Read's 1958 essay. Also includes an introduction by Milton Friedman and an afterword by Donald Boudreaux.

One major problem with making a positive impact on a global level, ultra-elite machinations aside, is that almost nobody focuses on what is important, which I hope to help remedy with this essay. Almost everybody hacks at branches if they hack at all. Conspiracists tend to obsess on elite machinations, which is an exercise of dubious benefit to begin with, but they often become paranoid and also confuse retail elites or other interests with the GCs. Bill Gates and David Rockefeller are probably not members of the GCs’ organization. Also, I learned that ultra-elites can only play their games with the responsibility that almost all people have abdicated as they play the victim. The GCs are only a symptom of our malaise, not a cause. They cannot be beaten at their game, and it is counterproductive and can even be suicidal to try. Making them obsolete is probably the best that we can do. While conspiracists often fixate on ultra-elite machinations, intellectuals, academics, and scientists tend to deny that such activities even exist or are meaningful. It took me many years to understand their resistance to even acknowledging ultra-elite existence, and I think it partly relates to the mainstream scientific worldview that . They have an ideological aversion to the notion that anybody manipulates events on a global scale, and believe that what seems conspiratorial is only anarchic elites competing with each other, which is like Darwin’s view of evolution. They believe that conspiracists see a pattern where none exists, or that the situation can be explained without invoking conscious intent, like materialistic hypotheses of how the universe operates. Radical leftists have to the of such elites; such an idea scares them. Neither obsession nor denial helps people attain productive understandings of the issue. Conspiracists and structuralists are united in thinking like victims, and that, as I see it, . Until they relinquish thinking like a victim, they will not constructively engage the critical issues that humanity faces, and energy ranks above all else. Victims are reactive instead of proactive, and only and resulting action has a prayer of working, in my opinion.

My Family :: Personal Narrative essay about myself

This essay has presented Earth’s many changing faces during its journey. Earth had molten beginnings, was , and may have . Later, and and . Earth experienced swings from to conditions as atmospheric gases dramatically changed, continents moved, and vast and of complex life played out on land and sea. But the changes happened over timescales of millions and billions of years, not hundreds. No climate scientist will deny that carbon dioxide traps infrared radiation and warms Earth’s atmosphere. The vented enough carbon dioxide into the atmosphere to create 200 million years of Greenhouse Earth conditions, when reptiles ruled Earth. Volcanism waned and around 150-to-100 mya. By 35 mya, and the Antarctic ice sheet began forming. Every paleoclimate study I have seen places greenhouse gas (and primarily carbon dioxide) concentrations as the primary determinant of global surface temperatures, after the Sun's radiation, but the Sun's output is considered to have been exceptionally stable and has risen slowly over the eons. , usually by accentuating the carbon dioxide with a positive feedback effect that may have reached runaway conditions at times.

Category: Personal Narrative essay about myself; Title: My Family

Essays - largest database of quality sample essays and research papers on Where I See Myself In 5 Years Essay

Beirut, Jan 1. I took a walk with my cousins on New Years’ eveinside the area in downtown Beirut where the pro-Hezbollah riotershave been staging an open-ended rebellion in front of the heavilyguarded government building. I was initially nervous –it was as ifI had entered another continent and century. It was easy to detectthat we were Christians: my cousin Helena was bareheaded in the midstof a crowd in which most women were veiled. But somehow the Shiitesare used to Christians among them and put up with us: interestingly,some of the Christians rioters wear orange wigs. Only inBeirut: punk-style Euro-revolutionaries hanging around in the middleof bearded Medieval clerics in austere togas.

An essay has been defined in a variety of ways

You can see the vast intellectual gap between Scott Atran and hisco-debaters, even with Daniel Dennett who is discussing an area heknows little about (the only other insightful intellect there is NickHumphrey who understood Atran’s position). Atran, as ananthropologist, knows a bit about human nature and ourformation of beliefs –he has enough culture to realize that thecrap about the “causes” of suicide bombing you hear on CNN needsto be verified in a scientific manner (the first suicide bombers inthe Levant were Trotskists). He is my kind of person: he knows bothArabic and Hebrew, has an intimate knowledge of the history ofreligions, from an anthropological vantage point, and has doneextensive field work across the planet. There is even a widerintellectual gap between him and the two sub-philistines Sam Harrisand Carolyn Porco, both of whom I’ve met and chatted with and countin the category as not remotely eligible for a dinner conversation(Porco’s emails go to my spam box). These two do not seem to haveenough intellectual curiosity to realize that what they say has beenwell covered around 200 years ago in hundreds of volumes that did notsurvive into our consciousness –their statements aremicrowave-reheated stale enlightenment talk. Microwave-reheatedcroissants are soggy.

A Workable Way Around the Problem of Induction. I alsodiscussed the problem of induction with him. To no avail (he had amental block about interesting subjects). To me the distinctionbetween mild and randomness provides a practical way to deal with theproblem of induction. Mild randomness is rather insensitive to theproblem of induction (Your observation of the past can help youderive properties of the future; you can go from the seen to theunseen). Wild randomness is very sensitive to sampling error –youdo not have properties to base yourself upon. Once again, Mandelbrotwrote about it in the 1950s (I figured it out 30 years after thegreat Benoit M.). Nationalism is murderous; it is far worse than religion.The other day my eye caught at the health-club a TV ad by democratsattacking Bush by stating that 3800 people died in Iraq. They omittedto mention the hundreds of thousands of Iraqis –lest theRepublicans question their . These foreigncasualties do not seem to count because nationalism establishes cleanbalance sheets: countries are only responsible for their owncitizens. Catholics would have never, never, never done that –theybelieve in the fraternity of races. It creates the “I and thou”.& remember where the murderous notion of nation-state came from.